the Foreign Offenders
Detention Ordiname provided a comentat I simpler and speedier substitute, & Ft I am
1
adersed that it mund the fore
be regarded
as
in Effect
an
extradition ordinance. and
The
the safeguards provided by sections 5(4) 96
(according).
the
should be preserved,
excing that these
the only provisions
which
give
are
the prisoner
the right & defend
himself, & section o
in the
the initiative
matter
leaving hal interely
3
& the
Governor
I am further
further adiried that
since the mere
repeal of section 2() 9
for cous?
82(d)
If Ord 23 of 1911 will not revive the provisions therely repeated of sections 5 (4) 96 ) Ord 118 / 24 free revival of the latter
A
for
to reenact the latter; and my telegram. it is necessay to read to suggest the adoption of this com
D
Date.
1911
C O
33005
349
Rs 12 OCT !!
33005
and finge
Wireless Selgraphy
Left Leas
copy corres with haval Auch from which it will be seen that use of apparaties by reich nut vessels, foreign men
war has been confined to time between 678 am
*
*******
ast previous Paper.
21194
Corres
Abi
23
Al. 1.28,032-50
1003. 11:10. A.E.W.
subsequent Paper
M Thith.
"To M. Johnson
Ries
70
Par Jhala
Mollin
BRY 26.
(1) Enc. 10 seems to me to peremptory
view of
en
Juf dashton 4407% General
which possibly the for. has overlooked.
Refer the etter should have rather läken
to that
the form of a request (not
If the Part
order ) based
& se inform the conveniences Admy sending them que? in wrist for perusal & rutin) (2) On 5 ian. 4 of me. 12
? Inform hu. that when the Shan Station is erected Inerchant ships should only be
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.